Here as an interesting article about Argentina:
http://cbsnewy
Argentine Jewish leaders demand action against soccer club whose fans waved swastika flags
Friday April 29, 2005
By KEVIN GRAY
Associated Press Writer
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) Jewish leaders demanded Friday that Argentine soccer authorities take action against a club whose fans waved flags emblazoned with swastikas at a professional match.
Television images showed fans of the second-divisio
The match went ahead as scheduled and police reportedly went into the stands after the fans but they disappeared into the crowd as the officers approached. No arrests were made, police said.
Jewish leaders criticized the referee for allowing the match to continue. Argentine league rules allow referees to call off games if crowd behavior becomes unruly.
The flag-waving ``was a clear provocation and racist,'' said Jorge Kirszenbaum, the president of DAIA, a leading Jewish organization.
He said several prominent Jewish groups were appealing to the country's soccer governing body, the Argentine Football Association, to take action against the club.
``This is extremely troubling and something has to be done,'' Kirszenbaum said.
Cordoba Mayor Luis Juez called the flag-waving fans ``imbeciles'' and said they and their club should be reprimanded.
``They should be severely punished,'' Juez told reporters in Cordoba, some 450 miles northwest of the capital.
The incident was the second involving racist behavior by Argentine soccer fans or players in recent weeks.
Earlier this month, an Argentine player was detained after a Copa Libertadores match in Brazil, accused of making racist insults toward a black Brazilian player.
In 2001, a match between two Argentine clubs was suspended after fans chanted anti-Semitic slurs against a team of predominantly Jewish players.
Argentina is home to a 300,000-strong Jewish community.
(Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
In the interest of timeliness, this story is fed directly from the Associated Press newswire and may contain occasional typographical errors.
Michael Chertoff, Homeland Nominee Aided a 911 Terrorist!
As incredible as this news may seem, it has now been revealed that the nominee of President Bush for the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, has ties with a man suspected of financing the 911 attacks, Dr. Magdy Elamir. There is also convincing evidence that Chertoff as head of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Justice Department shielded this financier of 911 from prosecution in a terrorist case.
The Record newspaper of Bergen County, New Jersey on June 20, 2000 shows that Chertoff defended Magdy Elamir who was sued by the State of New Jersey for $16.7 million dollars in losses. Over $5.7 million went “to unknown parties…by means of wire transfers to bank accounts where the beneficial owner of the account is unknown.”
Who is Elamir Magdy, Chertoff’s important client? On the NBC program, Dateline, on August 2, 2002, Rep. Ben Gilman, R-NY, of the House International Relations Committee was quoted as saying in 1998 that Magdy Elamir had “financial ties with Osama bin Laden for years.”
In fact, Elamir even had strong connections with the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993.
Magdy Elamir was one of the most important financial supporters of the Al Salam mosque. The Al Salam mosque was where Omar Abdel-Rahman preached, the Muslim extremist who was later arrested for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Former New Jersey police officer Allan Duncan said that “The Jersey City area and particularly the Al Salam mosque were allowed to continue as a major hub of terrorist activity in the United States.” During this period, 1990 to 1994, Chertoff was the U.S. Attorney for this area, the District of New Jersey. Amazingly, even after this period, Elamir later became one of Chertoff’s most important clients.
In 1999, Magdy Elamir and his brother Mohammed were named suspects in Operation Diamondback which was an FBI/ATF undercover infiltration of Pakistani arms dealers who sought to arm Osama bin Laden with conventional and nuclear weapons. According to the testimony of officer Duncan and taped transcripts with FBI informant Randy Glass, Elamir was a key player in this operation. According to Dateline NBC Mohammed Elamir tried to purchase small arms and ammunition in a recorded telephone conversation with Glass.
Dateline confirmed that Elamir and his corporation had paid at least $5000 to Egyptian arms dealer Diaa Moshen. Moshen was sentenced to 30 months for his involvement in Operation Diamondback.
Officer Allan Duncan, who was hired as an investigator by families of the September 11 attacks, said that the reason Elamir was never convicted was because he was never charged with a crime. When Operation Diamondback culminated in arrests in the summer of 2001, Michael Chertoff had become the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the criminal division of the U.S. Justice Department and Operation Diamondback was under his authority.
Chertoff blocked the indictment of his former client, Magdy Elamir.
Chertoff has also blocked the indictment of other Israeli partisans like himself with ties to 911.
In a four part investigative report on the Brit Hume, Fox News program in December of 2001 it was revealed a huge Israeli Mossad spy team of at least 100 members had been arrested by the FBI. The Fox News report revealed that the Israeli spy ring had penetrated FBI, CIA, DEA, U.S. Attorney’s Offices, Federal judges, even military bases. In addition, the Mossad, through an Israeli company was and is able to monitor all phone calls made in the United States, including those of law enforcement agencies. It is known that Israeli drug kingpins in the United States escaped prosecution because of this penetration.
It also revealed that Mossad agents had closely shadowed the 911 hijackers for months before 911. They repeatedly failed lie detector tests. Considering their close monitoring of the hijackers for months, the FBI agents are quoted as saying, “How could they not have known” the details of the 911 attacks. The report suggests that the Israeli Mossad knew the details of the attacks in advance but did not provide the information to the United States. In one of its most revealing moments, the Fox News report quotes an unnamed FBI source saying that for an agent to expose Israeli spying is “career suicide.”
Michael Chertoff freed the over 100 members of a huge Israeli spy ring apprehended in the wake of 911, including the Israeli agents who had tapped the telephones and shadowed 911 terrorist leader Mohammed Atta and many of his hijacker team for weeks before the attacks.
Chertoff also freed five Mossad agents who had been arrested and detained for months by the FBI on the day of the 911 attacks. They had been caught in New Jersey filming and cheering the 911 attacks on the World Trade Center. Interestingly enough they were apprehended with large sums of cash, false passports, and boxcutters (the same devices used in the hijackings). The FBI also found self-taken photos of very happy Mossad agents grinning and flicking their lighters with the World Trade Center burning in the background. Chertoff also allowed all of the apprehended Israeli spies to return to Israel out of the reach of American investigators.
Israel and the Jewish supremacists could not afford these revelations of Israel’s spying and treachery. They had to put one of their own in position to protect their interests. They found him in Michael Chertoff.
Michael Chertoff is the son of a rabbi and a long-time radical Zionist and Jewish supremacist. After the first apprehensions of the massive Israeli spy ring occurred, this dedicated Zionist was quickly put into the position of head of the Justice Department Criminal Division. The United States State Department, Justice Department and Executive branch is honeycombed with Israeli loyalists. President Bush was and is surrounded by them. In the popular vernacular they are called Neocons, but they are simply Jewish supremacists who put the agenda and interests of Israel over that of the United States. Two of them, Wolfowitz and Perle, were the chief architects of the Iraq War, a war good for Israel but an unmitigated disaster for the people of the United States. The Zionist network has many avenues by which they can get almost any appointment in government they want. They put him in a position to quash this story of Israeli treachery, and he in fact did so.
After freeing the Israel spies involved in 911 and other espionage activities, and despite having never served in the judiciary, Chertoff was given the high position of a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals whose jurisdiction includes Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the Virgin Islands. After 19 months as judge, President Bush nominated Chertoff to the position of Secretary of Homeland Security.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a government advocacy watchdog agency, has noticed Chertoff’s advancement from Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice to Secretary of Homeland Security nominee over the past four years.
“It’s an exceptional rise to power,” said Fitton.
Indeed, Chertoff’s rapid rise was exceptional, but one completely understandable with the risks of exposure presented in the Israeli spy ring and involvement in 911. Their man had to be put in very quickly.
Michael Chertoff could not afford the prosecution of Magdy Elamir because it would have revealed his own close connection to this bin Laden supporter who was one of the financiers of the 911 attacks.
In 2002, I was speaking all over America and world exposing the Israeli connections to 911 and the over 140 members of the Israeli spy ring that was then held in FBI custody. Zionists in the U.S. State Department attempted to prevent my appearance on a primetime program broadcast over the worldwide Al-Jazeera network. (Newsweek: Periscope). They failed, and the program aired to millions around the world and received a tremendous response. I was offered hundreds of invitations to speak on the matter before influential organizations, media and groups all over the world. Within 60 days of my appearance on Al Jazeera, Mr. Chertoff as head the criminal division of the U.S. Justice Department authorized prosecution against me on tax and financial matters. This is the same Michael Chertoff who freed the same Israeli spy ring that I helped to expose!
And now it turns out that Chertoff himself has aided one of the financiers of bin Laden and the 911 attack! It is also clear that he has obstructed justice in preventing this terrorist’s prosecution.
And now, our Jewish-Neocon-
Under control of the Jewish supremacists our nation’s government has gone insane.
Sincerely, David Duke
Here I have posted an interesting story concerning some people who do not like the Lord of the rings for the curious reason that it is too "White" whatever that may mean. For those of us who love Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic mythology you must read this article.
‘Lord of the Rings’ Rules Oscars
You Can’t Make This Stuff Up, etc: “Anti-Racists” Say Lord of the Rings too “Eurocentric”
Sam Francis, VDare.com, Feb. 19
[See also: Today’s Letter: Gimli Agrees With “British Reader”]
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a self-appointed “watchdog” organization in Montgomery, Alabama that purports to keep a sharp eye out for “racism” and “hate.”
Despite its name, it doesn’t seem to have much to do with either the South or the law, let alone poverty, other than avoiding the latter for its own officers, most of whom reportedly pull down six-figure salaries for themselves.
But this week its well-paid but merciless eye fell upon a target not usually associated with “hate”—the immensely popular and widely praised epic film series “Lord of the Rings,” the last installment of which is now showing at your local Bijou and has been nominated for no fewer than 11 Academy Awards.
The SPLC’s website, tolerance.org, last week reprinted an op-ed from Pacific News Service by Andrea Lewis, a San Francisco based writer who has discovered that at least the current film in Peter Jackson’s stunning cinematic version of the three-volume novel by J.R.R. Tolkien should really have been named “The Return of the Patriarchy.”
There just aren’t enough fighting females in the movie for Miss Lewis, but she also doesn’t like it because “Almost all of the heroes of the series are manly men who are whiter than white” and “exude a heavenly aura of all that is Eurocentric and good. Who but these courageous Anglo-Saxon souls can save Middle Earth from the dark and evil forces of the world?”
Perhaps you begin to catch her drift. [‘Lord of the Rings’ vs. ‘Matrix’: Patriarchy vs. the Rainbow Coalition, Jan 05, 2004]
Miss Lewis thinks “Lord of the Rings” is bad because it reflects white racial and patriarchal stereotypes, and as a matter of fact, it probably does.
That’s because those “stereotypes” are integral to the complex tale of civilizational struggle that Tolkien was telling, a tale that thoroughly modern multiculturali
It’s the tale of our real civilization because the kings, warriors and heroes who led us have always been manly men who really were whiter than white, and that just might have had something to do with why they won the struggle against their civilization’s enemies, medieval and modern, at all.
That, of course, is what Miss Lewis and her pals at the SPLC don’t like.
What they do like is “The Matrix,” the endless, tedious and incomprehensib
“Neo, the [Matrix] trilogy’s central figure, is played by mixed-race actor Keanu Reeves. His savior and mentor is Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne), a powerful leader who also happens to be a black man. The wisest figure in ‘The Matrix’ is the Oracle, a warm and witty African American woman.
“The films also are infused with a strong sense of Asian style and culture, exemplified by the character Seraph (Collin Chou) who is both a martial arts expert and Buddhist meditation practitioner.”
Perhaps here too you catch her drift.
The drift is that what Miss Lewis and the SPLC boys who chose to reprint her article like is not “tolerance” and what they oppose is not “hate.”
What they oppose is any positive portrayal of white people.
What they like is any production that writes whites out of the picture.
Well, not entirely. Another reason Miss Lewis likes “The Matrix” is that it depicts whites as villains.
“Most of the really bad guys in ‘The Matrix’,” she gloats, “are Euro,” including a Frenchman, two British albino twins [Peter and John Brimelow write: hey!] and “a rather stuffy and pompous white guy with white beard and white suit who reeks of imperialism.”
What she really approves of is any production that not only demotes whites from heroic roles but serves to demonize them in new anti-white stereotypes. Nothing more clearly exposes the SPLC’s real anti-white agenda than Miss Lewis’ silly article. The “multicultural
The fact is that “Lord of the Rings” is an important, beautiful and entirely healthy movie, more or less faithfully based on an important, beautiful and entirely healthy book, which itself draws from some of the deepest springs of Western culture—the myths and folklore of Northern Europe—and tells an important, beautiful and entirely healthy story that white Western men need to hear.
That story is about how the enemies of their civilization were crushed by manly men (and hobbits) who had the strength and courage to fight back.
I understand why people like Miss Lewis and the SPLC don’t much care for it.
Comments from Readers
From: Brett L.
Sam Francis is H. L. Mencken reincarnated, and this article contains his typically brilliant wit and prose. How many times have you heard, "It's a black thing"? Or have you noticed the exclusivity of the black clothing line FUBU - For Us BY Us?
Well, Ms. Lewis, LOTR is a white thing, and thank God an unapologetical
You know there were some serious discussions on how to handle the "diversity" issue when these films were being cast. I'm going to speculate that it was Peter Jackson's conviction to be true to the books that trumped the arguments of those who would have bowed down to the multi-culties. May God bless the responsible party(ies).
Top
From: M. Scott
Actually, the movies toned down the material considerably from Tolkein's books. In the books, the evil orcs were decribed as black, with flat noses and long, ape-like arms (know anyone like this?) The emphasis was on how semi-humanoid they were. If we had them living in the United States (and I'm not really saying we don't), they'd be referred to as some type of hyphenated-Ame
In the movie, the orcs were (caucasian) flesh-tone or (in Moria) light gray. Only the half-orc, half-human Uruk Hai of Isengard were the right (dark) color. The producers were being a little cautious. From a multi-culti standpoint, Tolkein's work is positively radioactive.
Other enemies of western men (men of Gondor and the northlands) included tribes of evil men who sided with Sauron. In the movies, these were regular Caucasian actors, with exotic-looking clothing and armor. In the books, the Southrons and Haradrim were always, without exception described as "swarthy" (dark). These swarthy men weren't just victims of circumstance, as in the Silmarillion (prequel) they tended to side with Morgoth (Sauron's old boss) and the orcs, trolls, balrogs and nasty whatnots against white men, white elves and white dwarves thousands of years before the War of the Ring was fought.
The racial overtones of the story were considerably lightened for the films, and with this in mind, the SPLC ought to shut up. Further, there is no shortage of movies one can go see (if one can stomache them) in which Orcish-America
Top
From: Brett L.
I don't think there is anything overtly or implicitly racist about the LOTR books (although sorcerers may now join the procession of the aggrieved). Yes, the men from the south were described as swarthy, but Tolkein was using the British Isles as a model, and he was probably thinking of north African corsairs and Moors as a reference.
I recall reading an article on a Jewish website claiming that Tolkein had compared Jews to his dwarves (insular and fond of gold and gems), but that seems a pretty mild comment. The article also claimed that, in the 1930s, the Third Reich contacted Tolkein to inquire if he was of Teutonic stock (he was) as his books wouldn't be translated into German unless he was. Tolkein more or less told the Nazis to shove it.
The article also claimed that Tolkein reserved his wrath most for the Normans, whom he despised because they invaded England during the 12th Century. That's holding a grudge.
You do have a point that the film makers likely avoided using dark-skinned bad guys where they could avoid it.
Top
From: John P. M.
The PC/Marxist types will harp on anything! This is yet another example of just how far they will go. You can't even enjoy a film anymore.
It is interesting to me that SPLC/Ms.Lewis, would extoll the virtues of the Matrix. This probably reflects on her/their rather surface oriented inability to look at some of the other implications of that film series.
Has anyone else ever been struck with the rather barbaric and crude society of the "real" world and its multi-cultural heros vs the civilized and structured society of the "Matrix" and the white villians. For example, contrast "the woman in the red dress sequence" in the first film, with the Woodstock meets a RAP orgey "dance sequence" of the second?
In part I wtite this tongue in cheek. However, my other point is this, if you look hard enough at anything you will see what you want!
Top
From: M. Scott
Tolkein might seem strange for having resented the Norman invasion of 1066. One assumes that as an Anglo-Saxon, he approved of the Saxon invasion of Britain 500 years earlier (or the Romans before that.). As someone who is overwhelmingly Celtic, I must express my disapproval of each, and as a descendant of Historically Aggrieved Persons, I am now demanding reparations from the governments of Germany, Denmark, France, Norway, and Italy.
Top